Home » Statistics & Probability Calculators » Spearman Rank Correlation Calculator

Spearman Rank Correlation Calculator

Home › Statistics & Probability Calculators › Spearman Rank Correlation Calculator

Spearman Rank Correlation Calculator

Spearman’s rank correlation ρs (rho) measures how well the relationship between two variables can be described by a monotonic function: as one goes up, does the other consistently go up (or down), even if not in a straight line? It works by converting each variable to ranks and then computing Pearson’s r on the ranks, which makes it robust to outliers and suitable for ordinal data such as ratings and placings.

Enter the paired values; the calculator ranks each variable (ties get average ranks), shows the rank differences d and d², computes ρs with the shortcut formula 1 − 6Σd²/[n(n² − 1)] when there are no ties, or the exact Pearson-on-ranks formula when there are, and tests significance with a t statistic on n − 2 degrees of freedom, the same approach SciPy uses.

Use Spearman when a scatter plot shows a curved but consistently rising or falling pattern, when the data are ranks or ordered categories, or when outliers distort Pearson’s r. For a genuinely linear relationship on interval data, Pearson’s r is more powerful.

Separate values with commas, spaces or new lines.

Separate values with commas, spaces or new lines.

Result and step-by-step solution

ρs = −0.1758
A weak negative monotonic relationship. p = 0.6272
Fail to reject H₀ at α = 0.05. The result is not statistically significant: the data do not give enough evidence at the 5% level to conclude that there is a monotonic association between x and y (ρs ≠ 0).
  1. Rank x and y separately (ties get average ranks)
    xyRank xRank ydd²
    106773416
    1002747−39
    8621100
    10150510−525
    992838−525
    1032969−39
    972026−416
    11312104636
    112692749
    110178539
  2. Sum of squared rank differences
    Σd² = 194
  3. Spearman coefficient
    ρs = 1 − 6Σd² ÷ [n(n² − 1)] = 1 − 6 × 194 ÷ [10 × (10² − 1)] = −0.1758
  4. Significance test
    H₀: ρs = 0   H₁: ρs ≠ 0 (two-tailed test)
    t = ρs√[(n − 2)/(1 − ρs²)] = −0.505, df = 8; p = 0.6272
  5. Decision
    p = 0.6272 ≥ α = 0.05. critical values ±2.306 (reject when |t| > 2.306).

Frequently asked questions

When should I use Spearman instead of Pearson?
For ordinal data, for monotonic but non-linear relationships, or when outliers are present. Pearson measures linear association on interval data.
Why doesn't the shortcut formula match the result when there are ties?
The 1 − 6Σd²/[n(n² − 1)] formula assumes all ranks are distinct. With ties the exact value is Pearson’s r applied to the average ranks, which is what the calculator reports.
How is significance tested for Spearman's rho?
With t = ρ√[(n − 2)/(1 − ρ²)] on n − 2 degrees of freedom, which is accurate for n of about 10 or more. Exact tables exist for very small n.
Can Spearman's rho be used with Likert-scale data?
Yes. Because it uses ranks, it is the usual correlation for ordinal survey responses.

Last reviewed: September 25, 2026. Calculations run in your browser and were validated against SciPy.

Scroll to Top